a national information resource for value-added agriculture
Agricultural Marketing Resource Center

Implications for Ethanol and Other Corn Users of the Shrinking Corn Crop

AgMRC Renewable Energy & Climate Change Newsletter
August 2012

Dr. Robert Wisner
University Professor Emeritus and Biofuels Economist
rwwisner@iastate.edu


USDA’s July 11 World Agricultural Supply and Demand Report (WASDE) verified what virtually all private crop forecasters anticipated, namely that prospective U.S. corn supplies are shrinking.   USDA cut its U.S. corn yield projection 20 bushels per acre from last month, to 146 bushels per acre.   It should be noted that this yield was not a field-based forecast, but is a judgment of USDA economists of what the potential corn crop may have been as of July 11, assuming weather would be normal for the rest of the growing season.  The decline in the potential size of the corn crop reflects severe drought that has affected crops across much of the mid-section of the U.S.  It is almost certain that the corn crop has been reduced further since the USDA economists made their projection.   The next official indication of the corn crop’s size will be on August 12 when NASS, USDA’s August field-based crop forecast (the first actual farm-field based forecast of the season) is released.  That report will be based on crop conditions at the end of July and the beginning of August.   The July 12 projection placed the U.S. corn crop at 12.95 billion bushels, still 4.2% above last year’s harvest because of increased planted acreage.  

If achieved, a crop of that size would be expected to produce adequate but still relatively tight corn supplies for the year ahead.  However, virtually all private forecasts now anticipate that both the corn acres harvested for grain and the U.S. average yield will be significantly lower than indicated in the July 11, USDA supply-demand report.  Current private forecasts appear to center on a potential crop of around 12.1 billion bushels, nearly 900 million bushels below the USDA projection.  Even this lower number is a moving target that could be lower if recent weather patterns continue through the end of July and the latest National Weather Service (NWS) 6-to10-day, 30-day, and 90-day forecasts materialize.  These forecasts show probable continued well below-normal precipitation and above-normal temperatures for a large part of the Corn Belt. Further complicating the corn supply picture is the increased risk that part of the crop may be contaminated by aflatoxin, as often occurs in times of drought.  Ethanol plants avoid aflatoxin-contaminated corn because the contamination is multiplied about three-fold in the DGS.  The latest NWS drought map, drought prospect map, and 30-day forecast maps are shown below.



Other dimensions of the feed grain supply picture include expected reductions from last year’s bumper crops in parts of the former Soviet Union, central Europe, last winter’s drought-reduced corn crop in Argentina, and China’s expanding demand for corn.   USDA’s July 11 world supply-demand report indicated wheat production in Russia would be 13% lower than last year, along with declines of 41% in the Ukraine and 43% in Kazakhstan.  These countries have been major sources of feed wheat exports to replace U.S. corn in world markets.  Grain trade analysts indicate their crops may have declined further since the USDA report was issued.   In the current marketing year ending on August 31, China has purchased approximately 200 million bushels of U.S. corn – even though it reportedly harvested a record corn yield and total corn production last year.  Rapid expansion in its livestock and feed industries in response to growing consumer demand for higher protein diets has shifted China from the world’s second-largest corn exporter a few years ago to a net corn importer.

These developments create a potentially very tight supply of corn and higher input costs for the biofuels industry as well as for the livestock industry and other users of corn in the year ahead.   Prospects for near-pipeline corn carryover stocks in the September 1, 2012 –August 31, 2013 marketing year will almost certainly make corn prices more volatile as well as much higher than last fall, winter, and spring.  At the same time, crude petroleum and gasoline prices have been gradually declining until very recently.   That combination pushed ethanol plant margins sharply into the red in mid-July and has resulted in a number of plant shut-downs.   



Figure 1 shows weekly ethanol production through July 20, 2012 and weekly production needed through August to meet the July 11 USDA projections.   Plant shut-downs have begun to reduce U.S. ethanol production and 2011-12 corn use at ethanol plants may be modestly below USDA July 11 projections.   On July 13, inventories reported by the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA) were 821.5 million gallons, 3.5 weeks’ production at the July 13 weekly rate .   Inventories appear likely to decline in the next several weeks, thus tightening ethanol supplies.  In response to prospects for tightening supplies, ethanol prices have increased sharply in the last few weeks.  The price increases have narrowed the price spread between nearby ethanol futures and RBOB gasoline futures prices by as much as 78 cents per gallon since early April.  At this writing, the spread is about a 22 cents per gallon discount of ethanol to nearby RBOB gasoline futures prices.

Prospective 2012-13 Corn Use for Ethanol

With the rapid tightening of prospective domestic corn supplies, possible increasing Chinese demand for corn, and indicators of shrinking foreign crops, the grain, feed, and ethanol industries are asking themselves what categories of corn use will likely be reduced in the year ahead to adjust to limited supplies.  The most likely categories are either domestic corn feeding or ethanol, or some combination of the two.  It appears that corn export demand may have some support from reduced feed wheat supplies, although currently projected world wheat supplies still appear large enough to support substantial wheat feeding.   Cash wheat prices in much of the U.S. have increased enough to take wheat out of the feed wheat market, at least for now.  That may tighten summer quarter corn supplies a little more than currently projected.

For the livestock industry, a key issue will be how much will ethanol plants reduce their corn use?  At this writing, that question is a complex one that will likely require several months to clarify.   It will depend on:

  • The number of outstanding unexpired RINs that are available for petroleum blenders to use as a substitute for their obligations to blend ethanol with gasoline,
  • The price of those RINs,
  • The value of ethanol as a way of increasing the octane rating of lower-grade gasoline, as reflected in wholesale ethanol-gasoline price differentials,
  • The price of distillers grain and solubles (DGS),
  • The size of U.S. ethanol exports, and
  • The number of RINs that ethanol-petroleum blenders desire to retain for use in 2014, 2015, and later years when 2007 Energy legislation ethanol mandates significantly exceed a 10% average blend with U.S. gasoline.

RINs are renewable information numbers issued to each gallon of biofuel produced.   One additional variable could possibly impact corn use for ethanol although the probability of its occurrence appears to be low at this writing.   That variable is the possibility of a partial waiver of the mandated quantity of conventional (i.e. corn-starch) ethanol mandated to be blended in the nation’s gasoline supply.  If ethanol production does not remain near recently reduced levels for much of the2012-13 marketing year, more of the adjustment to tight corn supplies is likely to fall on the livestock sector. 

How Many Excess RINs are Available?

The ethanol industry has produced more ethanol than mandated in the last several calendar years and has operated at an average annual rate above the mandated level earlier in the current marketing year.   That in turn has generated excess RINs that can be used as substitutes for actual ethanol blending.   The exact amount of excess RINs currently available is uncertain because precise data either are unavailable or are not easily assessable from EPA web sites.  EPA is the agency that enforces the mandates.

Part of the excess production has been exported.  Ethanol exports in most cases may not count toward the mandates, but they do require RINs.   Thus, exports absorb some of the ethanol and RIN production that exceeded domestic mandates.    Numbers being circulated in the grain and ethanol trade indicate there are around 2.5 billion gallons of excess RINs.   These numbers appear to be the RIN inventory at the beginning of the 2012 calendar year. 

 RINs needed in 2012 include the mandated 13.2 billion gallons of conventional (i.e. corn starch) ethanol plus U.S. ethanol exports.  There is a substantial time lag in release of ethanol export data.   First quarter 2012 exports were at an annual rate of roughly 800 million gallons.   Using 825 million gallon exports for the 2012 calendar year (down 31% from 2011) gives total RINs needed in 2012 of 14.025 billion gallons.   Ethanol production so far this year has been about 7.4 billion gallons .  The latest weekly production was 234 million gallons, reflecting recent plant idlings.  Using an average of 230 million gallons of ethanol production per week for the rest of 2012 would push this year’s total production to about 13.2 billion gallons of ethanol and RINs production.  This would be about 850 million gallons below potential 2012 calendar year RIN needs.   This shortfall could be offset by unexpired RINs carried over from previous years and/or carrying part of the shortfall into 2013. 

 Excess RINs may become more of an influence on ethanol production and corn used in ethanol plants in 2013 because of expected very tight old-crop supplies and 2007 Energy legislation that raises the 2013 mandates by 600 million gallons, along with another 950 million gallons in 2014.  In deciding the amount of excess RINs to use next year, ethanol blenders will need to assess the potential need for RINs in 2014 and 2015 vs. 2013.   Needs in those years will depend on (1) the speed with which E-15 is adopted at retail fueling stations, which is the main potential mechanism for raising the blend wall, (2) whether U.S. gasoline continues its recent downward trend (thus shrinking the available gasoline pool for blending with ethanol), and (3) whether EPA establishes required 2013, 2014, and 2015 required ethanol-gasoline percentage blends based on the 2007 energy legislation, without regard to the blend wall.

Recent Ethanol Returns

Returns for processing corn into ethanol and DGS have fluctuated in a wide range during the last 10 months, from very profitable levels in late 2011 to strongly negative returns in the last several weeks with the rapid increase in corn prices. The very negative returns have been followed by a modest recovery in the last several days as ethanol prices increased.   Weekly costs and returns from the summer of 2008 through July 13, 2012 are available in chart form at http://www.card.iastate.edu/research/bio/tools/hist_eth_gm.aspx  These returns are based on spot market prices.  Actual returns will vary depending on conditions at individual plants, the local basis for corn and ethanol, how much forward pricing of inputs and outputs the ethanol plant has done, whether it removes corn oil, and other factors.   Several ethanol firms have recently announced plant shut-downs because of large negative returns.

Conclusions

This year’s severe and widespread drought is already creating major challenges for all users of U.S. corn.  Current weather forecasts and declining crop condition reports suggest that the challenges may be intensified in the weeks and months ahead.   The 2012-13 corn marketing year appears likely to be a major test of the conventional ethanol mandate and excess RIN mechanisms and their impacts on corn use.    Excess RINs almost certainly will bring a reduction in corn use by the ethanol industry in the year ahead, although there are differing opinions on the probable amount of reduction.  Some in the grain trade note the recent sharp increase in ethanol prices as production has declined as a possible indicator that ethanol has considerable value for increasing the octane content of lower grade gasoline.    Others expect most of the excess RINs to be used in 2013 to substitute for the required ethanol blending with gasoline.   Still others anticipate that ethanol blenders will be reluctant to use all of their excess RINs in 2013 because of another potentially large increase in the ethanol mandate in 2014 that may push required ethanol blending moderately above what the fuel market can absorb.  If the ethanol industry is unable to moderately reduce its corn use in 2013 because of these factors, a larger reduction in corn use for feed and possibly in exports would be likely.  

References

U.S. Energy Information Agency, Petroleum and other Liquids, Total Stocks. The EIA defines these stocks as follows: “Stocks include those domestic and Customs-cleared foreign stocks held at, or in transit to, refineries and bulk terminals, and stocks in pipelines.”

2  R. N. Wisner, “Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) and Government Biofuels Blending Mandates”, Renewable Energy Newsletter, Ag Marketing Resource Center, April 2009 and W. Thompson, S. Meyer, and P. Westoff, “Renewable Information Numbers are the tracking instrument and bellweather of U.S. biofuels mandates, “ Euro Choices, Vol. 8, Issue 3, June 15, 2009.

3  EPA “Questions and answers on the renewable fuels program”,  (includes regulations showing the need for RINs for ethanol exports), EPA420-F08-006, April 2008.

4   EIA, Petroleum and other liquids, Weekly Ethanol Plant Production,  July 13, 2012.
 

 

USDA Rural DevelopmentPartially Funded by USDA Rural Development
...and justice for all.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Many materials can be made available in alternative formats for ADA clients. To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964.
 

Iowa State University

The names, words, symbols, and graphics representing Iowa State University are trademarks and copyrights of the university, protected by trademark and copyright laws of the U.S. and other countries.